Speaker summary
55%6 analyzed articles/videos337 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marine Corps results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 894.745 faulty-reasoning hits from 337 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 7% (42,164 of 45,134 speakers). This Marine Corps is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group.
Marine Corps
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
7%Marine Corps (selected)8%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.6% percentile
7.0% BS Score6 analyzed videos337 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.1%14.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 9.3%9.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.3%6.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 9.2%9.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.4%1.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5%No True Scotsman: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate