Author summary
28%5 analyzed articles/videos2,286 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Derricke Dennis results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Indoctrination, and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 4.7% saturation with 463 hits. Analysis detected 4,598 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,800 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 15% (8,048 of 9,467 authors). This Derricke Dennis is better (less manipulative) than 85.00% of the peer group.
Derricke Dennis
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
15%Derricke Dennis (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,800
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

15% percentile
025507510015.0% percentile
1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.0%2.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate