Publication summary
27% 9 analyzed articles/videos 4,164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military.com results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 632 hits . Analysis detected 7,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,578 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (392 of 584 publications). This Military.com is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 17,578
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.9% percentile 1.1% BS Score9 analyzed articles17.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst