BS Summary: These www.globalsecurity.org results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, In-Group Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 87.8% saturation with 699 hits. Analysis detected 3,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 29.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (2 of 254 publications). This www.globalsecurity.org is worse (more manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group.
www.globalsecurity.org
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%WBUR1%
⁠1%Houston Chronicle1%
⁠1%FactCheck.org1%
⁠2%@politifact1%
⁠2%www.wbez.org1%
⁠99%CBC Gem7%
⁠99%Decatur Daily9%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community28%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org (selected)30%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events32%
Publication details
Total words: 796
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
www.globalsecurity.org attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
www.globalsecurity.org vs All Other Publications
www.globalsecurity.org attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.