Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video74.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jon Cherry results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 357 faulty-reasoning hits from 74.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (20,107 of 45,122 speakers). This Jon Cherry is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Jon Cherry
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠56%Jon Cherry (selected)35%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 74.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
34.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos74.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 53.1%53.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 46.9%46.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 31.3%31.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.8%18.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 53.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 46.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos