Speaker summary
60% 30 analyzed articles/videos 1,814 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hasan Piker results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.3% saturation with 533 hits . Analysis detected 3,773.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,814 analyzed words across 30 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 3% (44,002 of 45,145 speakers). This Hasan Piker is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group. Hasan Piker
Speaker details
Total words: 1,814
Article count: 30
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.5% percentile 4.6% BS Score30 analyzed videos1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 9.0% 9.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.9% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst