Townhall⁠93%

Of Course Abdul El-Sayed Hates Michigan's Top Tourist Destination ⁠86%

By Amy Curtis⁠96%

8/7/2026, 12:30:42 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 35 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.3% saturation with 174 hits. Analysis detected 1,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 368 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 71% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (4,315 of 30,584 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 85.90% of the article peer group.

It's going to be a very interesting U.S. 
Senate race in Michigan. 
Republican Mike Rogers is trying to court disaffected Democrat voters, some of whom have formed Democrats for Mike Rogers, a group that says it's putting country before party in its opposition to Abdul El-Sayed. 
Meanwhile, El-Sayed is threatening Rogers, telling him to stay in his Florida house because El-Sayed's supporters will "hold him accountable." 
El-Sayed's campaign buddy, Hasan Piker, wants Haley Stevens voters and other Democrats who didn't back El-Sayed to face "Marxist-Leninist" punishment for stepping out of line. 
That'll win over voters. 
And we're sure this newly leaked video of El-Sayed hating on Mackinac Island, Michigan's number one tourist destination, will help endear him to Michiganders, too. 
"How does someone who hates the state he's running in even have a chance?" 
this user wrote. 
"I hate Mackinac so much," El-Sayed says. 
"It's funny because, like, if we win this is going to be the summer home and it's going to be like every time I've ever come here I've hated it." 
Is that because the idyllic island is 57 percent white and a low crime rate, when adjusting for tourism? 
Probably. 
The Democratic Socialists hate this. 
The polls show a tight race, so they just might. 
This writer's son went to Mackinac Island over the summer and loved it. 
This is exactly the same as Aftyn Behn saying she hated Nashville and country music while running in Tennessee. 
What both really hate is traditional white culture. 
Yes. 
They hate America and traditional white culture. 
They will destroy both if they get the chance. 
Do not give them that chance. 
That is the fundamental difference between the Democrats and the Democratic Socialists. 
The latter group is willing to say out loud what the former only thought or said at cocktail parties. 
Editor’s Note: The 2026 Midterms will determine the fate of President Trump’s America First agenda. 
Republicans must maintain control of both chambers of Congress. 
Help Townhall continue to report on the Democrats’ radicalism and inform voters as our nation faces a crossroads. 
Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to receive 60% off your membership. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 17.1%Amy Curtis: 7.9%Townhall: 5.5%Confirmation Bias17.1%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.7%Townhall: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Amy Curtis: 3.0%Townhall: 2.6%Availability Heuristic10.3%This article: 10.3%Amy Curtis: 0.8%Townhall: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic10.3%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.5%Townhall: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Amy Curtis: 1.7%Townhall: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias1.4%This article: 10.6%Amy Curtis: 9.5%Townhall: 10.0%Framing Effect10.6%This article: 5.4%Amy Curtis: 0.3%Townhall: 0.4%Loss Aversion5.4%This article: 2.4%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.3%Status Quo Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.2%Amy Curtis: 0.9%Townhall: 1.2%Optimism Bias2.2%This article: 6.3%Amy Curtis: 2.5%Townhall: 1.8%Pessimism Bias6.3%This article: 47.3%Amy Curtis: 14.8%Townhall: 13.2%Negativity Bias47.3%This article: 8.2%Amy Curtis: 0.6%Townhall: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 3.4%Townhall: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 14.4%Amy Curtis: 4.2%Townhall: 4.3%In-Group Bias14.4%This article: 9.0%Amy Curtis: 5.0%Townhall: 3.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.8%Townhall: 1.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.8%Townhall: 1.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.9%Amy Curtis: 1.1%Townhall: 1.2%Recency Bias10.9%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.6%Townhall: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%Amy Curtis: 7.7%Townhall: 5.4%Ad Hominem10.6%This article: 6.8%Amy Curtis: 3.9%Townhall: 1.9%Straw Man6.8%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 3.3%Townhall: 3.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 12.0%Amy Curtis: 2.6%Townhall: 1.9%False Dilemma12.0%This article: 2.4%Amy Curtis: 2.7%Townhall: 1.7%Slippery Slope2.4%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 9.0%Amy Curtis: 15.1%Townhall: 9.4%Hasty Generalization9.0%This article: 4.9%Amy Curtis: 0.8%Townhall: 0.6%Red Herring4.9%This article: 2.7%Amy Curtis: 1.4%Townhall: 1.2%Bandwagon2.7%This article: 25.0%Amy Curtis: 9.7%Townhall: 10.4%Appeal to Emotion25.0%This article: 0.3%Amy Curtis: 2.6%Townhall: 2.1%Begging the Question0.3%This article: 6.8%Amy Curtis: 2.6%Townhall: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.8%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 1.4%Townhall: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.1%Amy Curtis: 1.9%Townhall: 1.5%Burden of Proof4.1%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.3%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%Composition/Division3.3%This article: 18.5%Amy Curtis: 2.5%Townhall: 1.6%Anecdotal18.5%This article: 5.2%Amy Curtis: 0.2%Townhall: 0.1%No True Scotsman5.2%This article: 12.8%Amy Curtis: 1.7%Townhall: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.8%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.0%Townhall: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.1%Townhall: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.3%Townhall: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.8%Townhall: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 13.3%Amy Curtis: 3.5%Townhall: 3.0%Unattributed Quote13.3%This article: 14.7%Amy Curtis: 2.0%Townhall: 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection14.7%This article: 11.4%Amy Curtis: 21.8%Townhall: 15.6%Biased Writer Voice11.4%This article: 14.1%Amy Curtis: 7.4%Townhall: 5.1%Indoctrination14.1%This article: 0.0%Amy Curtis: 0.3%Townhall: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 27.4%Amy Curtis: 21.2%Townhall: 13.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias27.4%This article: 15.5%Amy Curtis: 6.1%Townhall: 5.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…15.5%

368 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers19%attributed speech299writer words
Selected voice

Townhall

100%flagged-word coverage
32 attributed words46% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +91.6 ptsWriter: 8.4%Townhall: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +28.5 ptsWriter: 27.8%Townhall: 56.3%56.3%Quote-first Misdirection-18.1 ptsWriter: 18.1%Townhall: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-14.0 ptsWriter: 14.0%Townhall: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-14.0 ptsWriter: 14.0%Townhall: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-7.4 ptsWriter: 7.4%Townhall: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.