Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,253 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan Senate Race results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 972 hits. Analysis detected 11,402 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,012 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (9,454 of 16,486 topics). This Michigan Senate Race is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Michigan Senate Race
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Michigan Senate Race attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Michigan Senate Race vs sitewide
Michigan Senate Race attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.