Author summary
76% 1 analyzed article/video 952 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stephen Rodrick results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 772 hits . Analysis detected 3,470 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,872 of 8,563 authors). This Stephen Rodrick is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Stephen Rodrick
Author details
Total words: 3,808
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.3% 20.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Tu Quoque: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst