Author summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video880 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sage San Martin results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 597 hits. Analysis detected 3,867 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,520 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (2,398 of 9,471 authors). This Sage San Martin is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Sage San Martin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠75%Sage San Martin (selected)4%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,520
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

75% percentile
025507510074.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 13.5%13.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 17.0%17.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.5%5.5%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 7.2%7.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 17.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.5%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 3.1%In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos