Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gloria McCahon Whiting results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Halo Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 64.4% saturation with 132 hits. Analysis detected 337 faulty-reasoning hits from 161 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (18,587 of 45,145 speakers). This Gloria McCahon Whiting is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Gloria McCahon Whiting
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠59%Gloria McCahon Whiting (selected)38%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 161
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
37.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos161 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 64.4%64.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 47.5%47.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 32.2%32.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 29.5%29.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.6%15.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 64.4%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 47.5%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 32.2%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 29.5%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos