Author summary
49% 1 analyzed article/video 655 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Burrell results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 291 hits . Analysis detected 1,257 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 53% (4,511 of 9,471 authors). This Chris Burrell is worse (more manipulative) than 52.40% of the peer group. Chris Burrell
Author details
Total words: 2,620
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 6.9% 6.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.9%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst