Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video50.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adam Friedman results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 76 hits. Analysis detected 178 faulty-reasoning hits from 50.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 67.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (8,259 of 41,273 speakers). This Adam Friedman is worse (more manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group.
Adam Friedman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠80%Adam Friedman (selected)68%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 50.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.0% percentile
67.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos50.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 68.4%68.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 65.8%65.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 34.2%34.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 68.4%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 65.8%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 34.2%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos