Author summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video969 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex Harris results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 453 hits. Analysis detected 1,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (6,039 of 8,623 authors). This Alex Harris is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Alex Harris
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠30%Alex Harris (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,876
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

30% percentile
025507510030.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 11.7%11.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Special Pleading: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Nature: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.2%No True Scotsman: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos