Publication summary
30% 6 analyzed articles/videos 1,861 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richmondside results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 672 hits . Analysis detected 5,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,424 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 35% (383 of 584 publications). This Richmondside is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 16,424
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.5% percentile 1.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst