Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These David Mills results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Bandwagon, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 193 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 9,471 authors). This David Mills is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
David Mills
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
⁠0%David Mills (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 1,252
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Author 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos