Keyword summary
16% 2 analyzed articles/videos 538 analyzed words
BS Summary: These East Bay Regional Park District results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Sunk Cost Effect , and Anchoring Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 2.4% saturation with 81 hits . Analysis detected 692 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,404 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 5% (56,790 of 59,653 keywords). This East Bay Regional Park District is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group. East Bay Regional Park District
Keyword details
Total words: 3,404
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.8% percentile 1.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst