Keyword summary
ā 1%1 analyzed article/video2,066 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Demark results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 0.5% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 219 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.2% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (50,186 of 50,190 keywords). This Paul Demark is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Paul Demark
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Paul Demark attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Paul Demark vs sitewide
Paul Demark attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.