Keyword summary
53% 1 analyzed article/video 739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Continuous Change results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Hasty Generalization , and False Dilemma , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 235 hits . Analysis detected 1,437 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 37% (38,137 of 59,730 keywords). This Continuous Change is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group. Continuous Change
Keyword details
Total words: 2,956
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst