Author summary
56% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These mbracken results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Indoctrination , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 278 hits . Analysis detected 3,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,462 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 37% (6,011 of 9,483 authors). This mbracken is better (less manipulative) than 63.40% of the peer group. mbracken
Author details
Total words: 5,462
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst