Publication summary
40% 10 analyzed articles/videos 2,928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These FedScoop results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 1,440 hits . Analysis detected 8,275 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,025 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 31% (404 of 584 publications). This FedScoop is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 20,025
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.9% percentile 1.1% BS Score10 analyzed articles20K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst