Topic summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicago Cubs results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 1,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,661 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (11,483 of 15,120 topics). This Chicago Cubs is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group.
Chicago Cubs
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠0%Alameda County1%
⁠25%Chicago Cubs (selected)3%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,661
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Chicago Cubs attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Chicago Cubs vs sitewide
Chicago Cubs attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos