Topic summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video708 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Army results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Halo Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 352 hits. Analysis detected 2,788 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (8,238 of 24,545 topics). This Army is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group.
Army
Topic details
Total words: 2,832
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.4% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.6%8.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos