Speaker summary
⁠63%2 analyzed articles/videos164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zach Nunn results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Indoctrination, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 54.409 hits. Analysis detected 261.79 faulty-reasoning hits from 164 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (29,688 of 40,165 speakers). This Zach Nunn is better (less manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group.
Zach Nunn
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠27%Zach Nunn (selected)17%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 164
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510026.1% percentile
16.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos164 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 28.0%28.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 11.0%11.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.4%14.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 22.3%22.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.4%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos