Author summary
61%1 analyzed article/video554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marissa Payne results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 383 hits. Analysis detected 1,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (2,256 of 8,706 authors). This Marissa Payne is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Marissa Payne
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
75%Marissa Payne (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,216
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

74% percentile
025507510074.1% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 17.3%17.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.0%9.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Optimism Bias: Author 17.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Composition/Division: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos