Author summary
61% 1 analyzed article/video 554 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marissa Payne results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Indoctrination , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 383 hits . Analysis detected 1,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (2,256 of 8,706 authors). This Marissa Payne is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Marissa Payne
Author details
Total words: 2,216
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.1% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 17.3% 17.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Optimism Bias: Author 17.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst