Speaker summary
57%1 analyzed article/video294.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vincent Yang results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 99 hits. Analysis detected 520.615 faulty-reasoning hits from 294.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of 11% (17,176 of 19,215 speakers). This Vincent Yang is better (less manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
Vincent Yang
Speaker details