Speaker summary
83%1 analyzed article/video70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Schiller results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 60.4% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 270 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 49.1% and a BS Rank of 64% (10,241 of 28,364 speakers). This Thomas Schiller is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
Thomas Schiller
Speaker details