Speaker summary
⁠44%9 analyzed articles/videos444.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Thomas Paine results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 118 hits. Analysis detected 501.39 faulty-reasoning hits from 444.667 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (25,767 of 28,364 speakers). This Thomas Paine is better (less manipulative) than 90.80% of the peer group.
Thomas Paine
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠10%Thomas Paine (selected)9%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%