Speaker summary
35%45 analyzed articles/videos962 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supreme Court results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 393 hits. Analysis detected 1,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 962 analyzed words across 45 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 3% (27,523 of 28,364 speakers). This Supreme Court is better (less manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group.
Supreme Court
Speaker details
Total words: 962
Article count: 45
Authors