Author summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video1,355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Gerut results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 505 hits. Analysis detected 4,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,420 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (2,902 of 4,887 authors). This Amanda Gerut is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Amanda Gerut
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠41%Amanda Gerut (selected)3%
⁠100%Daniel Arkin38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,420
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Amanda Gerut attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Amanda Gerut vs sitewide
Amanda Gerut attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos