Author summary
ā 19%1 analyzed article/video5,806 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Paul Starr results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Optimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.9% saturation with 847 hits. Analysis detected 7,946 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,418 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ā 3% (5,892 of 6,074 authors). This Paul Starr is better (less manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group.
Paul Starr
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Ideastream Public Media1%
ā 0%Megan Fan Munce1%
ā 0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
ā 1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
ā 3%Paul Starr (selected)2%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 17,418
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Paul Starr attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Paul Starr vs sitewide
Paul Starr attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos