Speaker summary
45% 1 analyzed article/video 295.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stassi Schroeder results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Representativeness Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 53.314 hits . Analysis detected 476.247 faulty-reasoning hits from 295.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 3% (44,010 of 45,040 speakers). This Stassi Schroeder is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group. Stassi Schroeder
Speaker details
Total words: 295.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.3% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos295.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 14.0% 14.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.7% 4.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst