Speaker summary
56%2 analyzed articles/videos15.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These SETI Institute results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Optimism Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 89.3% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 75 faulty-reasoning hits from 15.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 89.3% and a BS Rank of 82% (3,988 of 21,655 speakers). This SETI Institute is worse (more manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.
SETI Institute
Speaker details