Author summary
⁠23%1 analyzed article/video645 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Howell results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 342 hits. Analysis detected 2,358 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (1,669 of 4,887 authors). This Elizabeth Howell is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Elizabeth Howell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠66%Elizabeth Howell (selected)4%
⁠100%Daniel Arkin38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,580
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Elizabeth Howell attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Elizabeth Howell vs sitewide
Elizabeth Howell attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos