Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video180 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Cantor results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 61.5 hits. Analysis detected 384.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (19,998 of 26,972 speakers). This Sarah Cantor is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Sarah Cantor
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠26%Sarah Cantor (selected)17%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 180
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos