Speaker summary
ā 88%1 analyzed article/video37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These San Francisco planning commission results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Optimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 37 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 87% (3,768 of 28,364 speakers). This San Francisco planning commission is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
San Francisco planning commission
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 87%San Francisco planning commission (selected)100%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 37
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos