Author summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marina Newman results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 136 faulty-reasoning hits from 711 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (1,362 of 4,860 authors). This Marina Newman is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Marina Newman
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠72%Marina Newman (selected)4%
⁠100%Daniel Arkin38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 711
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Marina Newman attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Marina Newman vs sitewide
Marina Newman attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos