Speaker summary
59%5 analyzed articles/videos410 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rob Stutzman results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, False Dilemma, and Overconfidence Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 83.499 hits. Analysis detected 619.831 faulty-reasoning hits from 410 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.8% and a BS Rank of 13% (36,295 of 41,270 speakers). This Rob Stutzman is better (less manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
Rob Stutzman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
13%Rob Stutzman (selected)10%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510012.1% percentile
9.8% BS Score5 analyzed videos410 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 19.2%19.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 13.0%13.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 19.2%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate