Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Maya Miller results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 295 hits. Analysis detected 1,274 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,946 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 8,698 authors). This Maya Miller is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Maya Miller
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Maya Miller (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 2,946
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.0%8.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 10.0%10.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.0%1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos