Speaker summary
61%1 analyzed article/video31.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter M. Donohue results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Optimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 28 faulty-reasoning hits from 31.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 88% (2,940 of 23,767 speakers). This Peter M. Donohue is worse (more manipulative) than 87.60% of the peer group.
Peter M. Donohue
Speaker details