Author summary
⁠20%2 analyzed articles/videos1,330 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Tanenbaum results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 283 hits. Analysis detected 1,748 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,386 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (4,386 of 4,954 authors). This Michael Tanenbaum is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Michael Tanenbaum
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠12%Michael Tanenbaum (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,386
Article count: 2
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Michael Tanenbaum attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Michael Tanenbaum vs sitewide
Michael Tanenbaum attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos