Speaker summary
63% 1 analyzed article/video 208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Schwartz results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and False Dilemma , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 59 hits . Analysis detected 507.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (38,744 of 45,144 speakers). This Neil Schwartz is better (less manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group. Neil Schwartz
Speaker details
Total words: 208
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.2% percentile 10.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos208 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 20.4% 20.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 14.7% 14.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 17.3% 17.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 13.5% 13.5% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 12.2% 12.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 18.9% 18.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 11.1% 11.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 20.4%, sitewide 3.3% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 14.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 0.8% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 0.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 11.1%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst