Author summary
34%1 analyzed article/video360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Karina Grokhovskaya results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 785 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,440 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 67% (3,127 of 9,471 authors). This Karina Grokhovskaya is worse (more manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Karina Grokhovskaya
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
67%Karina Grokhovskaya (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,440
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

67% percentile
025507510067.0% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.0%9.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 4.0%4.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Circular Reasoning: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos