Speaker summary
⁠70%1 analyzed article/video92 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Fralinger results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Overconfidence Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 59.8% saturation with 55 hits. Analysis detected 92 faulty-reasoning hits from 92 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (20,780 of 45,145 speakers). This Michael Fralinger is worse (more manipulative) than 54.00% of the peer group.
Michael Fralinger
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠54%Michael Fralinger (selected)34%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 92
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510054.0% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos92 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 59.8%59.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.8%22.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 59.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.8%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos