Speaker summary
59%15 analyzed articles/videos904.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mallory McMorrow results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 196.254 hits. Analysis detected 1,404.074 faulty-reasoning hits from 904.333 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 2% (44,727 of 45,532 speakers). This Mallory McMorrow is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group.
Mallory McMorrow
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
2%Mallory McMorrow (selected)4%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

2% percentile
02550751001.8% percentile
4.0% BS Score15 analyzed videos904.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 11.3%11.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 0.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate