Author summary
ā 60%1 analyzed article/video787 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James David Dickson results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 491 hits. Analysis detected 3,049 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ā 64% (2,999 of 8,320 authors). This James David Dickson is worse (more manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
James David Dickson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Hannah Martin1%
ā 0%Paul DeMark1%
ā 0%Emma Sedlak1%
ā 0%Michael Fox1%
ā 0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
ā 64%James David Dickson (selected)3%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,148
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
James David Dickson attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
James David Dickson vs sitewide
James David Dickson attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos