Publication summary
⁠93%3 analyzed articles/videos4,575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Talking Points Memo results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 2,696 hits. Analysis detected 16,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,725 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (93 of 336 publications). This Talking Points Memo is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group.
Talking Points Memo
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%Brookings1%
⁠1%FactCheck.org1%
⁠1%@politifact1%
⁠1%Berkeleyside2%
⁠2%The Colorado Sun2%
⁠73%Talking Points Memo (selected)3%
⁠99%The White House9%
⁠100%The Inlander12%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Total words: 13,725
Article count: 3
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Talking Points Memo attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Talking Points Memo vs sitewide
Talking Points Memo attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos