Publication summary
⁠89%4 analyzed articles/videos4,575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Talking Points Memo results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 2,811 hits. Analysis detected 20,967 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,635 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (102 of 339 publications). This Talking Points Memo is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Talking Points Memo
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%Brookings1%
⁠1%FactCheck.org1%
⁠1%@politifact1%
⁠1%Berkeleyside2%
⁠2%The Colorado Sun2%
⁠71%Talking Points Memo (selected)3%
⁠99%KESQ9%
⁠100%The White House9%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Talking Points Memo attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Talking Points Memo vs sitewide
Talking Points Memo attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos