Author summary
ā 88%1 analyzed article/video1,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melinda Haas results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 1,138 hits. Analysis detected 5,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,314 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ā 70% (1,744 of 5,759 authors). This Melinda Haas is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Melinda Haas
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Megan Fan Munce1%
ā 0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
ā 1%Levi Sumagaysay1%
ā 1%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
ā 70%Melinda Haas (selected)4%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,314
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Melinda Haas attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Melinda Haas vs sitewide
Melinda Haas attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos