Speaker summary
⁠59%2 analyzed articles/videos63.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Habtom Samuel results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 115.523 faulty-reasoning hits from 63.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (27,871 of 43,679 speakers). This Habtom Samuel is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Habtom Samuel
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠37%Habtom Samuel (selected)22%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 63.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
21.2% BS Score2 analyzed videos63.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 37.4%37.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 33.8%33.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.1%8.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos